Tuesday, 26 October 2010

Self-help

1994

The envelopes started arriving at my house that summer, A4 brown rectangles packed to bursting point with paper and good intentions. I think they turned up about once every week, and their thud on the doormat was about the only noise those mornings, interrupting my lie-ins. I was back in Reading for the long break between my second and third years at university at the time, with nothing much to do except avoiding anything looking like hard work. It was a stretch at home before the home stretch.

I only had to look at the spidery scrawl on the front to know they were from Anna. We’d split up at the start of the holidays, for reasons I can no longer remember. I may not have even known them at the time; I certainly couldn’t have told you which breakup this was, because we’d done it so often. We could break up over a meal, over an evening, over something one of us had or hadn’t said, over a weekend. I’d lost count a long time before that, and so had everybody else. The first time we parted, some of my friends told me that I was better off without her. The second time, they waited a week and then took their chances. The retraction came soon after. After the third time they gave up offering their consolations and just ringed a date in their mental calendars. If they’re not back together by then, maybe I’ll say something.

This was our longest break up, and it stretched across that summer like a hit single that’s number one for months. It coloured everything; I couldn’t buy a paper, eat an ice cream or walk the dog without knowing that I was single. At first the melody was new and exciting, the novelty value of being free of recriminations was quite something. I even found myself wondering if it was time for my story to have other characters in it. On long sun-bleached evenings on the benches outside the Bull And Chequers, sinking lagers with my friends, I may even have looked around for candidates, though I didn’t try that hard. But like that hit single, several weeks down the line I was tired of the tune. It would have been nice to read a book, sit in the library, take the train to visit my friends without hearing it all the time.

The envelopes started to arrive just at the point that I’d had enough.

I opened the first one, working out from the size and heft of the contents that it was far longer than any letter she had ever written me. It had always been a bone of contention, because back then I was so insecure that I thought an eight page letter meant somebody loved you twice as much as a four page letter did. I still remember the flimsy pale blue aerogrammes she sent me from Burma, one every couple of days, and how much work that must have involved when she was supposed to be out there, on riverboats and in temples, experiencing all that differentness. But somehow it wasn’t enough for me. With hindsight I can see what I couldn’t see then; that nothing ever was.

I remember how proud I was of being the only person who could read her handwriting. I mistakenly thought that meant I understood her.

Inside was a sheaf of neat white pages, no folding, no creases. It took a second for me to register that most of the writing on them was in a typeface and it wasn’t by her. As I flicked through and saw handwritten scribbles in the margins in the jagged handwriting, more masculine than mine, I put the pieces together and realised what had happened. Spending the summer in her father’s flat in Maida Vale, she passed her days walking to Paddington Library, photocopying huge swathes of self-help books and, sitting there in the quiet surrounded by all the pensioners of West London, annotating them before sending them to me. In a summer when we should have been taking life by the scruff of the neck, she had even less to occupy her time than I did. She had run out of words to illustrate my failings, and how angry she was with me, so she’d resorted to using someone else’s.

My correspondence course lasted several weeks and I found out a lot about myself, because she didn’t stint on detail. Idly flicking through the pages, in the break between This Morning and Neighbours, in the last gasp of not having to worry about the future, I didn’t even stop to wonder why I was still paying attention. But pay attention I did, and over the course of a number of meticulously sourced and personally tailored modules I discovered all sorts of things; that I was bad at communicating, that I was nowhere near understanding enough, that I had unrealistic expectations and that I didn’t like myself very much.

I learned the first three things on that list by rote, by reading the text and reading the comments and memorising what I’d been told. I don’t know, even now, if I ever truly believed it or if I just wanted to change the record. I told her I’d read them, I told her she was right, I took the train down to Paddington to see her and we got back together. The relationship lasted less than six more months after that, and I only learned the last thing on that list the hard way, right at the end.

I should, of course, have figured it out from the fact that I touched those photocopied pages at all.

2010

The friendly-looking red card had been sitting in the mailbox when I got home from work, saying they’d tried to deliver something to me but couldn’t because they needed a signature. For a week, I’d kept meaning to phone them to reschedule it, but was hampered by the fact that I couldn’t for the life of me remember what exactly I was arranging delivery of. That’s the problem with having a good memory, in my experience. Life, an intermittent thing of wonder for the absent-minded, contains far less pleasant surprises for the likes of us. You never forget that you’ve bought something fun online or find a stray ten pound note in a winter coat pocket on the first day after the seasons turn.

At first I thought I’d missed the boat and that it would be returned to the sender. I wasn’t too upset. I figured it was probably something official and inessential; a new debit card, some documentation about the pension I try not to think about or a tedious communiqué from work about terms and conditions. Whoever it was from, they’d just have to try again once they realised nobody was home. But then I had a peek on the back of the card and found out that I wasn’t too late. They were still keeping it for me, so on a Saturday morning we hopped into the car and headed out to collect my surprise package.

Driving seems to be one of the exceptions to the rule where going against the flow slows you down, and so we zipped through the streets, avoiding the route that goes past the children’s playground with the huge bright falsely cheerful murals and the pub on the corner that nobody can seem to make a go of. Instead we headed up the long hill, past the Brazilian café and the convenience stores, past the lovely flat with the terrible bathroom and the gorgeous house with no parking that we nearly bought instead of our home. The car shimmered through dozens of slightly different lives we almost lived.

We were making a beeline for the industrial estates, a place I try to avoid because they remind me of work. They were dreary enough during the week but even worse at weekends and going there was like attending the funeral of somebody you never liked in the first place. Further out still were the football stadium, the business park, the grimmest Holiday Inn in all of creation, but before that we reached the sorting office, with the weekend world dropping by in dribs and drabs. They were the exception rather than the rule; on the way out it felt like everybody else was going in the opposite direction, hurtling into town for appointments with lunch and shopping or to treat the kids to some uncomplicated crap in the multiplex at the very start of half-term.

I stepped inside and took my place in the queue behind a streak of people waiting patiently to pick up their presents to themselves. Santa sits behind a grille all year round handing out toys, gadgets and DVDs and he doesn’t seem to care much whether you’ve been a good child or not, provided you’ve got ID. When I got to the front, the surly man handed me an electronic device and a pointer. It was impossible to use it to produce anything even approximating to parody of my signature, but he was completely indifferent to that. Back in the car, I looked at my gift, a brown envelope, heavy, with thick contents. On the outside, it said it was from Amazon but still I couldn’t remember ordering it. There was a reassuring rasp as I pulled the tab to open it up, and I reached inside to liberate its contents. It was a book, large white words on the front cover proudly inciting me to Feel The Fear And Do It Anyway: the epitome of self-help, celebrating its twentieth anniversary.

I didn’t even need to look at the slip inside to know it was from my mother.

Unsolicited advice from her wasn't new, heaven knows, but the medium of internet shopping wasn’t one that she’d tried before, as far as I was aware. I showed it to Kelly and a flash of shared comprehension passed between us. It was nice to know we were in it together.

“You’re not going to read it, are you?”

“No. Would you?”

“No, probably not. We could drop it through her door if you want?”

I half-smiled, half-sighed, all at once.

“Let’s not, let’s just go home.”

I was thinking a lot of things as we pulled away from that grotty grotto in the middle of nowhere worth speaking of and made our way back to civilisation. I was thinking that I couldn’t believe we had wasted all that time driving to the crappest part of town to pick up a book I didn’t want and wouldn’t read from somebody I wasn’t speaking to making a point I didn’t want to hear. I was remembering the thud on my doormat all those years ago. I was thinking that sometimes it’s nice just to say no, and that sometimes saying no nicely just doesn’t work. I was thinking that sometimes there’s no point in saying anything at all.

I was thinking that sixteen years ago, if someone else had sent it to another me, I might have read that book.

Then I found myself thinking about the things that didn’t change. I was thinking that when you run out of words to say your last desperate attempt is to use someone else’s. And then I was thinking about the main lesson I learned back then, as clear as if that long but not forgotten summer was in front of me again with that relentless melody playing for weeks on end. Just because somebody can read your writing, it doesn’t mean that they understand you.

49 comments:

otherworldlyone said...

First, this was a great post with lovely imagery. I love the way you bring places and events to life. And the way you tie it all together.

Second, I admire your courage. The last sentence is so sad...but so true.

Sharon Longworth said...

I can't make any claims to know and understand you. I certainly won't be pretentious enough to tell you how to live your life. But I would say that I like what I read from you, and I like the impression of you that gives me.
It seems to me that you are more than capable of making your own decisions about the life you lead - and from where I'm sitting that life and those decisions don't look bad at all.

Happy Frog and I said...

What a powerful post. I know what OWO means about the last sentence and that would normally be the bit that I would look to resonate with me. But in this case the bit that got me was: 'I was thinking that sometimes it’s nice just to say no, and that sometimes saying no nicely just doesn’t work. I was thinking that sometimes there’s no point in saying anything at all.' I can relate to that.

deililly said...

I loved this post but am left wondering if anyone should say it or indeed anything with a self help book. That way lies madness for all concerned surely. The spectre of Bridget Jones is still riding high in my mind.

Though ridiculously curious about that book and wanting to read it now for some strange reason. *slaps self*

Philip said...

What Sharon said. I couldn't put it any better. Doesn't it say it all when someone sends their SELF help book to someone else. Some people have no sense of irony.

julia said...

It seems like people sending you self help material is the coward's way out of continuing a fight with you. Similar to a kid writing nasty things about someone on the inside of a bathroom stall. All the venom, none of the risk of direct confrontation.

Maybe you could send your mom a bill for the time wasted in getting the book. An impersonal invoice seems like an appropriate response.

Mimi said...

I like that last line. Don't we learn some very interesting lessons as we wind our way through our lives?
I remember when I learned that love did not mean never having to say "sorry" - I'm embarassed even writing that, but it's true, I used to believe it!

#1Nana said...

Oh dear, when someone gives you or recommends a self-help book it means that they think you need help? Gee, I thought that they just thought that I'd find it interesting. Let me stay in denial a little bit longer!

Robbie Grey said...

Self-help books are of the Devil, I'm sure of this. Having been accused of having a memory that'd make an elephant cry with envy, the passage about having a good memory held resonance. Also, what Otherworldlyone said about the last line is indeed true words.

FigMince said...

Back a few decades, I was asked by a rural neighbour to buy a book for her while I was in the city. I dutifully went into Adelaide's Cope Bookshop (seriously, that was its name and it sold only self-help books). I asked an assistant if they had a copy of "When I Say No I Feel Guilty", and she said they did. I couldn't resist then asking her if she was now going to ask me if I wanted to buy it which, somewhat puzzled, she did. "I guess so," I replied. "I'd feel very guilty if I didn't." She didn't crack even a glimmer of a smile. I think maybe she needed a book on lightening up.

Anyway, a beautiful write from you, as usual. Thank you.

arandomchild said...

To me, the saddest part of this wasn't the ending of the relationship. And it wasn't the discovery that, "Just because somebody can read your writing, it doesn’t mean that they understand you". For me, the saddest part was that you have lost the ability to believe that you could understand someone because you could read their writing.
When you still believed that, you were proud (and, I would venture to add, probably somewhat joyful) "of being the only person who could read her handwriting". Now, you have lost the ability to ever feel that pride (and joy) again. But, as a very wise man once said, "Ignorance is only bliss to those who are no longer ignorant."

Shruthi said...

That last line about sums it up I think.

The visual quality of your writing amazes me every time. I love how your reader is present in every place you take them to...

Lady Jennie said...

I was awash with curiosity (I thought there was a "u" in that word), wondering if Anna had decided to make a reappearance - if she had finally found the words to express what she was feeling after 16 years.

Without knowing anything, I wonder if your mom was just trying to communicate with you and establish a connection, however badly.

Penny Dreadful said...

Great final line.

The Jules said...

Well written, and very perceptive.

Reminds me of a great quote I read the other day . . .

Er . . .

vanessa said...

I went through a period where I was very depressed.I got a lot of self help books from friends.I read them.They helped (as did the counselling).
I didn't see the books as attacks on who I was...more as a way of reaching out when they had no appropriare words.

vanessa said...

oops..typo

Jane said...

I read this late last night and it has been in my head all day today. A beautiful, perceptive piece of writing especially the last paragraph.
And "The car shimmered through dozens of slightly different lives we almost lived." Wonderful.

Still_lemonade said...

I can't help thinking that the big difference is that your mother loves you, whereas Anna was mental.

Kimberly said...

..........yawn.

Mr London Street said...

Thanks for the eloquent and thoughtful feedback Kimberly - you are the sort of reader every writer longs for.

The fearless threader said...

A really well thought out, incredibly articulate critique Kimberly. I wish I had your turn of phrase.

MLS, I think this is one of your best pieces. And as I said on twitter gloomily illuminating. More of these please and don't worry about the pointless 'critiques' from the wordless ones.

Kimberly said...

Oh, the milquetoastiness of it all! Sometimes one word will do. Or do Brit writers disagree?

This is just not one of the better posts on this blog. But I should have expected that adding anything but unicorns and rainbows to the barrage of verbal blow-jobs in this thread would label me a "hater" or inarticulate.

A hater and an observer are two different things.
Do you want to engage in discourse or not? Is that not what the point of this blog, and your Twitter feed, are?

Apologies for not felating the better posts at this address more exuberantly prior to adding two cents here.

Anonymous said...

I think your Mother stinks, and thats all I can say about that. Kudos to Kelley for being your bodygard in the crap part if town (smile)

Mr London Street said...

Well now Kimberly, I am always open to well intentioned constructive feedback. But since you have never commented on my blog and coincidentally started following me on Twitter only today for some reason I just can't buy this idea that you are a regular reader who happens to be disappointed in this one. Just a hunch. And of course if you think saying "Yawn" constitutes engaging in discourse I wouldn't turn up to any writers' groups in a hurry if I was you.

Anyway, I'm sorry you didn't like it. But I suspect anyone pretentious enough to bandy around terms like "milquetoastiness" with a straight face is unlikely to get much out of my stuff to be honest.

Anonymous said...

I do believe the milquetoastiness was a play on the pretentious nature of the author, not the commenter.

There are writers and there are bloggers, Mr.Pseudonym.

I can't say how long Ms. Kimberly has been reading, but I can say that it is apparent from almost every post how bland your tone, style and life are.

As someone who has read more than one post, I can say with certainty that I am uninterested in your characters, your funbus, the moments you chose to focus in on as proof of your love for your wife. It's an old bag. It's tiring. Very often, it's verbose.


Your 100 word posts would be valiant attempts at more concise writing if they actually told stories instead of pondering, forcing a kind of poetry onto the mundane.

Perhaps try fiction if you'd like to be a writer. If you learn not to force poignancy and stretch out the banal and mundane, perhaps there would be stories to tell about the lives of others in world you create.

Instead, we get navel gazing mundanity and a cadre of others cheering you on.

There will always be people who follow, because people seek connection. When they read a blog, they want connection. They comment to say they exist and they are reading and won't you please read what they wrote too, maybe.


But there will also be those of that read and read and then gave up, on your verbosity, the stiffness of your humor, the lack of a natural rhythm, flow and emotion without the blueprint.

For those of us who feel that way, I salute Kimberly's yawn.

It concise and it is genuine. It is all that your writing is not.

Mr London Street said...

If you heckled half as well as I wrote, I'd be devastated.

You don't, so I'm not.

Kimberly said...

This whole exchange is why blogs are best read quietly and not commented upon.

Sharon said...

I think this blog is fantastic and I have yet to read a post that I didn't like. I am neither lacking in "artistic culture" or an ability to discern good writers from poor ones.

However a persons gramatical aptitude and vocabulary knowledge does not make them a good writer (aimed at the Annonymous).

Also, my failure to comment on posts is NOT because I lack something to say, but I too like annonymity. I read this blog for MY own pleasure.

There is one indisputable fact, this blog is different, the people here do not comment to gain attention.

The atmosphere here is friendly and if you hang around long enough Annonymous you will agree.

I happen to love this Blog, although I have just a small request.

I'd like an update on your friends dating scene, has she found the man of her dreams yet? You must keep us informed on the lives of the people you introduce in your posts. They are the characters in Mr. Lonondstreets life "play" ...so once in awhile an update would be nice (or have I missed one?)

Glad you are still blogging Mr. Street, now I am retreating to the shadows.

Eidothia said...

I dint half follow why some of your readers are spilling venom here. Perhaps, they simply concluded you would say nothing at all in the end, based on your post and took the chance. But from my side - I love reading your blogs because it is exactly the kind of writing that is disappearing fast. And you for me are one of the last few ones carrying that burden of a baton. Although am sure you enjoy it as much as I do, reading the outcome. So.... Cheers.

Eidothia said...

Almost forgot to add - I myself hate the self help books. It was one of my subjects for the cruel blog attack I made a long time ago.

Philip said...

Why is it that some idiots can't tell the difference between constructive criticism and plain old sniping. Go boil your heads, stub your toes, bang your elbows, bite your tongues, and drown in your own bile. How simple is it - no one is demanding you read anything - so get outta here.
MLS - you write from where it matters. And lots of us really appreciate that.

Jane said...

I read and follow the writing of MLS because it makes me feel, question, remember, laugh, smile and cry - though not all at once.
Very occasionally a post will leave me cold.

I comment because I appreciate this and also have the ability to criticize constructively when I feel it is needed.

I agree with Philip - if you can't be constructive and don't like what you're reading then don't bother.

Nene said...

Thought provoking post. Quite meaningful to me as I have extremely troubled relations with my family and am always loaded with guilt - believing I could try harder. Although my husband says I've done everything I could and SHOULD STOP NOW.

It never ceases to amaze me that people bother to comment on blog posts they don't like. One thing is to enter into a political discussion, another to attack people in this way. It's so weird!

The fearless threader said...

A little pointer to Anonymous, some of the greatest literature has been about pondering moments, 'Mrs Dalloway' and 'In Remeberance of Things Past', to name but 2 off the top of my head. I am not a 'high brow' reader, I am a reader of words that speak to me, on a level that is personal, emotional, intellegent and imaginative. If I don't like what someone writes, I stop reading, simple as that. That is the ultimate criticism, being ignored. I should know, millions ignore my very small, very personal blog. I suggest you try some other blog in which to pretend your 'intellegence' and worthy reading are what makes you a better person, and I'll stay here and enjoy the honesty I read in these blog posts. The open hearted relationships MLS shares with us gives me hope that I too can be honest and vulnerable but still thrive in this painful, dark and depressing world.

Helen said...

I think it is patronising, in this context, to describe these posts as "ponderings" and "musings". There are truths in there and they are often illuminated quite brilliantly:

The car shimmered through dozens of slightly different lives we almost lived.

The mundane, the daily routines, the sameness and familiarity of parts of our lives - are treated tenderly and respectfully here. That this writing doesn't attempt to bludgeon you over the head with pretentious tricksy-ness is what does it for me.

I don't always agree with you MLS - but I am grateful for your words.

Helen

Moannie said...

I will not rise to the venom of those people who come to jeer, postulate and then to denigrate those of us who keep returning.

They are free to leave without staining the furniture.

It is the ordinariness of your life, coloured by your writing that brings me back and back again.

Mum used to say, when we were being bullied: consider the source, and ignore it.

otherworldlyone said...

Don't mind me. I'm just here for the verbal blowjob.

I completely agree with Philip (well said, buddy) - though I wish I would have gotten here to say it all first. I never was one for sloppy seconds.

Pearl said...

This is why I come here, Mr. Street: to take in your personal view of the small, quiet moments in our lives. You do it well, and you do it without fuss.

Pearl

jan geronimo said...

Uh-oh, I'm afraid I like this post even at the risk of indulging myself in yet another case of verbal blowjob. Well done, MLS.

Jeannie said...

After reading the post and all of the comments so far, I have to refer to Helen's comment:

"The mundane, the daily routines, the sameness and familiarity of parts of our lives - are treated tenderly and respectfully here. That this writing doesn't attempt to bludgeon you over the head with pretentious tricksy-ness is what does it for me."

Let me remind you that the TV show Seinfeld was based on the mundane and made millions as a top-rated show.

If I'm ever tempted to denigrate someone's post (this doesn't happen often), I remember how difficult it is to write in the first place, and that it's coming from the heart no matter what. If I don't like something I'm more apt to exit quietly.

The rudeness displayed here by yawning and endless kvetching exibits is immature at the least and to the mature mind defies comprehension. What do you think this is, a pundit convention? Have some respect for fellow writers. If you want to help with critiques, do so in a positive manner. Anything less is unwarranted and ridiculous.

MLS is one of the most talented writers in the blogosphere AFAIC. Maybe he will, one day, write a book where the characters will tell a larger story--who knows? But for now he's doing splendidly on this blog in his inimitable style while amassing his followers who think he's pretty terrific.

Jeannie said...

*exhibits even. ;)

And furthermore...! j/k

Have a great evening, all.

Bass said...

I liked it

Mr London Street said...

Thanks to (nearly) everyone who stopped by and commented on this one. Thanks too to everyone who said such lovely things when I (and I suppose, by implication, you lot) got all that lovely feedback from the latest anonymous coward. I did delete a couple of comments on this post which basically said that I only leave up positive comments and am only interested in people who (and I'm trying to remember the quote) "rub my cock". Oh well. There will always be some mentals won't there.

OWO - Thanks. Not an easy post to write, this one, so I'm glad you think it worked.

Sharon - Quite. I didn't feel like it was a needed or requested intervention, but it is par for the course I'm afraid. And thanks for saying such lovely things.

HF&I - I'm pleased that something in there "got" you.

deililly - I can send it over if you want.

Philip - There is quite a bit of irony in it, isn't there?

Julia - Maybe not. I think I've probably said quite enough about it really.

Mimi - That slogan has a lot to answer for if you ask me.

#1Nana - You stay in denial as long as you want. And when you want to come out there's probably a self help book for that.

Robbie - I don't know if you can write off a whole genre like that. The book I read when I gave up smoking, technically speaking, was probably a self-help book and it was one of the most important books I ever read.

Mr London Street said...

FigMince - Thanks for such kind feedback. It reminds me of the old joke that if you ask where the self-help section is the bookshop employee should say "that would defeat the whole point wouldn't it?

arandomchild - I don't know if that's sad so much as realistic. But I've never really believed in graphology so I should always have known better.

Shruthi - Thank you. I'm never sure whether I've painted it clearly or not. I guess it's hard to tell, since I already know what these things look like and you'll never know for sure. It's wonderful feedback that you feel placed in that moment though.

Lady Jennie - I wrote about Anna a while ago. The chances of her making a comeback are highly unlikely.

Penny Dreadful - Thank you.

The Jules - I think you are destined to be more quotable than quoting.

Jane - Thank you. Knowing that you thought about it again after clicking away from it is high praise indeed.

still_lemonade - Oh, I don't know. Anna loved me, for a start.

Mr London Street said...

The fearless threader - Thank you. Believe me, I only worry about critiques from people I know whose opinions I respect, as should we all.

Anonymous (the civil one) - Even I think that's a little strong. But thanks for the words of support anyway.

Kimberly - No, what this exchange illustrates is that parachuting into a blog just to slag it off is the oddest waste of time I can imagine. "I hate your posts, I've read them all" - really? You big fibber.

Sharon - First of all thanks so much for unlurking. I'm sorry it took a few visits from the Jehovah's Witnesses of blogland to flush you out. I'm so pleased you like my stuff, whether you choose to comment or not. As for my friend - well, I was out with her last night and she hasn't been on any dates since I last wrote about her. Trust me, she's more disappointed about that than either of us are.

Mr London Street said...

Eidothia - Thanks so much for pitching in. You have been reading my blog for quite some time, so it's an enormous compliment that it still has something to hold your attention.

Philip - Really, it's their own time they're wasting. And I do sort of understand, I read blogs I think are crap as well. I just don't comment on them and I tend not to single them out by name on Twitter any more. But haters will hate, and at least they're picking on me rather than somebody they could discourage into quitting.

Jane - I would be genuinely curious about the ones that leave you cold. Drop me an email about that.

Nene - Lovely to get a comment from you. I know, families are such an awkward minefield. I very rarely write about this aspect of mine.

FT - There is space for pondering in a narrative, if you ask me, and space for narrative in even reflective writing. Some of the writing that leaves me cold - just my personal opinion - is all reflective but forgets to tell a story of some kind.

Helen - I know several Helens occasionally read the blog and I don't know which one you are. But thank you for the support. I tend to think it's patronising too - some of my favourite writers are brilliant at illustrating big truths or big questions with small events. But I suppose if somebody had a taste for the overblown they would not enjoy my stuff and that's fair enough.

Mr London Street said...

Moannie - Thank you. Good point; they're not just criticizing me, they're criticising you lot as well. Never mind, eh.

OWO - You are one of the best examples of this idea that you'll always take constructive feedback from people whose opinions and judgement you respect.

Pearl - Not the posts about male sex toys then?

Jan - Thank you. I accept your apology for liking my writing.

Jeannie - There has been no constructive criticism here because that was never the intention of anybody weighing in with criticism. That's fine; everyone knows that. Interesting this suggestion of telling "big stories" - to my mind the idea that somebody would think they are doing that sounds sort of self-important.

Bass - I liked your comment.

The Kid In The Front Row said...

I just wrote a lengthy response to this. I got caught up in the argument.

But I just deleted it because, instead, it all made me smile. It made me smile because; the comments in this thread are all the proof you need that Mr London is a fantastic writer. He should print out the word 'yawn' and frame it; because a comment like that is proof that he is doing something very right with his writing.